top of page
Search

Parshat Devarim 2024 - Rubber and Glue


By Dan Cohen


One of the hardest things I’ve learned is to “own” my feelings. There is a concept in mental health therapy called a “projection.”  It occurs when you “project” your feelings about yourself onto another person.

In kindergarten, the playground retort when someone said something mean to me or my friends, “I am rubber, you are glue. Everything you say bounces off of me and sticks to you.”  


Here’s another approach to understanding projections. Imagine you have a flashlight. When you shine it on a wall, it shows a shape or picture on the wall. The shape isn’t actually on the wall; it's from the flashlight. When someone "projects," it's like shining their flashlight onto someone else. 

They might feel something inside, like being scared or mad, but instead of realizing it’s their feeling, they think someone else is feeling that way. So if they’re angry, they might say, “Why are you mad at me?” even if the other person isn’t mad. They see their feelings in the other person, just like the picture on the wall from the flashlight.


This idea came to mind as we opened the fifth and final book of the Torah this week.  Devarim, often called Mishne Torah, differs from the first four books in that it records Moshe's extended and final speech to the people. Commentators wax eloquently about Moshe’s prophecy and how this book documents a level of wisdom and Gd-connectedness we have not seen since. 


Like any speech or conversation, what matters aren’t just the words someone chooses but the potential meanings behind them and the profound and potentially unconscious reasons why. 

In Chapter 1, Verse 27, we read that after the spies returned with their dangerous and defamatory report, Moshe said to the people, “You murmured in your tents and said, "Because the Lord hates us, He took us out of the land of Egypt, to deliver us into the hand[s] of the Amorites to exterminate us."

Rav Hirsh often leverages individual words in the Torah to gain deeper understanding, and this week is no different. In exploring how Moshe retells and reexplores the spies' story, he focuses on two specific words and draws important lessons for us.


In Chapter 1, Verse 27, we read the word ReGeN, which is listed above as murmuring but can also mean incitement. The word's background is obscure but denotes an activity that incites and fuels quarrels.  It can also mean a projection, which he calls mutual incitement. 

Hirsch says the word HaReGeN signifies an agitator. This person appears to be fighting for his cause and upset about a wrong done to himself or, under the appearance of being indignant at the wrong done to another as though it were himself. He then incites others to join the fight. When we look around at public and political discourse these days, it is easy to find leaders seeking to harness outrage by claiming victimhood for themselves or borrowing the victimhood of others.


Hirsch finds the same rarely-used word elsewhere in Proverbs Chapter 16, Verse 28, where we read a similar use of ReGeN: "A perverse man incites quarrel, and a grumbler alienates the Lord.”  Rashi reads this to mean that the grumbler alienates Gd from himself and assumes Gd is angry with him, but it belies our belief that we can never be alienated from Gd. 

The idea that Moshe is trying to teach us about projections goes even further just a few verses later in the Parsha.  


In Chapter 1, Verse 29, we read, “And I said to you: Do not be dismayed and do not fear them!”  Here, he refers to the residents of the land of Canaan whom the spies feared and whose fear gripped the nation. 

The word dismayed emerges from the letters spelling the root EReTZ.  Hirsch points out that the word, defined in another translation as “broken,” can mean either a person’s feeling of fear or the fear that a person inspires in another.  It means to be frightened and also to frighten.  Why would Moshe choose to use this loaded word?  


Hirsch points out that the word's root also means to “Gird oneself with all one’s strength.”  When facing someone looking to inspire fear, we can oppose the individual and the projection of fear or dismay she is attempting to inspire in us. It is up to us how we respond when others are trying to sow fear and discord, much as some in the nation did when the spies returned with their awful report.

To be clear, I still struggle with projections. Sometimes, I am angry, but I choose to “stash” that anger in someone else, like another driver on the road.  On the flip side, sometimes, a friend accuses me of a behavior he is exhibiting.  


Moshe thought it essential to teach us this lesson in the first chapter of his extended goodbye speech. The Rebbe gave vital insight into why that might be.  


His Chumash says, “Even when the Jewish people lost faith in Gd, to the extent they felt Gd hated them, Rashi teaches us that “He loved you.”  The Be’er Mayiim Chaim adds that in this dangerous and challenging moment in the desert, the Jewish people hated Gd, so they imagined He hated them too. 


As a kid, I remember my parents saying they would love me no matter what I did. As a spoiled brat, I even asked whether that love would apply even if I engaged in the worst behavior imaginable. Their answer was always yes, but with a caveat that they hoped I would make wise choices.


So where did that leave me, and by extension you, and every other individual when it comes to a Gd who has said the same thing to us? It means that no matter how low a person falls spiritually, even to the point of projecting his hatred of his circumstance onto a hatred of Gd, that person should know that Gd continues to love her.  


At the same time, it means we must be firm, transparent, and strong in setting our boundaries and pushing back against incitement from others.  Knowing that Gd is on our side makes it easier to say to others sowing dissent that their position isnt persuasive.  In those moments, we can simply draw attention to the feeling that person is projecting onto us, stare at it together, and then hand it back, saying, “I think this is yours.”


Parshat Matot Masei 2024 - Life, the Universe and Everything

By Dan Cohen


We previously discussed author Douglas Adams and his book series, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy. For this week's McGuffin, we return to his text.


Adams wrote a crucial joke in the plot of his books. He wrote about a giant computer called Deep Thought, which reveals that the answer to the meaning of Life, the Universe, and Everything is "Forty-two." 

This joke has become a universal symbol - like if you know, you know. People still reference it in various ways, like noting "42" in different contexts or naming office complexes like those at Google's HQ and CERN. Even Finding Nemo uses the address 42 Wallaby Way.


Likely, Douglas Adams did not study Tanach, yet there are many connections to understand how 42 might be the answer to everything.   


First, earlier in the book of Leviticus, we read about the High Priest's service on Yom Kippur. On the holiest day of the year, in the most sacred location on earth, in the holiest of holies, the High Priest utters Hashem's 42-letter name. This 42-letter name honors Gd’s divine power and essence. Gd instructed us to make it a significant part of the Yom Kippur service. The name was rarely uttered and only done by the one man designated. 


We read, “For on this day he (the High Priest) will provide atonement for you to purify you.” (Leviticus Chapter 16, Verse 30)


We learn that when the people outside the Temple heard the High Priest utter the holy name of G‑d, etc., they would prostrate themselves and proclaim G‑d's majesty. They would say the words we use daily after the first line of the Shema Prayer, i.e., "Blessed be the name of His glorious Majesty forever and ever." (Baruch Shem Kavod Malchuto L’olam Va-ed). Millennia later, we still bow down, a unique occurrence, during the Yom Kippur service and prostrate ourselves to honor this occurrence and connection with Hashem.


The very use of the 42-letter name and the thoughts of reverence filling the people's minds at that moment were holy and elevating. Having Hashem in mind at that particular moment lifted the nation.


Second, in our Parsha, Chapter 33 in the Book of Bamidbar opens with verses 1 and 2: “These are the journeys of the children of Israel who left the land of Egypt in their legions, under the charge of Moses and Aaron. Moses recorded their starting points for their journeys according to the word of the Lord, and these were their journeys with their starting points.”


The parsha then describes the 42 journeys and stops the Jewish nation made across the 40 years in the desert between leaving Egypt and arriving in Israel. 


The Baal Shem Tov, a prominent figure in Chassism, proclaimed, “The forty-two ‘stations’ from Egypt to the Promised Land are re-enacted in the life of every individual Jew, as his soul embarks on its journey from birth to its return to its Source.” This profound insight underscores the spiritual growth and personal development that the 42 stops symbolize, inspiring us to embrace our life's journey at every stop with courage and determination.


The 42 stops are also referred to as journeys, symbolizing the continuous process of growth and learning. Each stop represents a phase in our lives, and each journey between stops presents an opportunity to learn, fail, and grow. Even when we feel stuck, we are still on a trip, with opportunities to learn and grow. These lessons will inform the rest of our journeys.  


Third, as you see in verse 2, the Torah elaborates on the journeys in two ways. “Moses recorded their starting points for their journeys according to the word of the Lord, and these were their journeys with their starting points.”  Why repeat it?


Rav Hirsch teaches that the first phrase, where the phrase “starting points” leads into “journeys,” urges us to focus on the future and where we are headed. We journey to grow closer to Hashem and gain greater knowledge of ourselves through trials and adversity. Gd, he says, wants us to understand that whether we like it or not, each stop and journey was part of his plan for us as individuals and as a nation.   


On the other hand, Hirsch's interpretation of how the phrase “journeys” precedes “starting points” serves as a reminder to remain present in each of these stops. While these are all part of a larger plan, self-awareness is available if we just hunker down and experience the moment in its fullness. Hirsch’s charge is the essence of mindfulness, which we’ve discussed many times: Be. Here. Now. This mindfulness tool can enlighten us and make us more reflective about our life's journey.


These three ideas may not yield the secret to Life, the Universe, and Everything as I had hoped, but they give us a running start.  From the Kohen Gadol and his utterance of the 42-letter name of Gd, we learn the value of keeping Hashem at the forefront of our minds. From the Baal Shem Tov, we understand that the 42 journeys give us meaning and growth opportunities. From Rav Hirsh, we see that our travels and 42 stops present opportunities for Emunah during our journeys and awareness of the power of the present moment during our stops. 


Our friends at Aish put it best: From these journeys, remember that each situation today is tailor-made for you to help you fulfill your highest potential. Now, look at your day, circumstances, and journeys through that lens and see if it unlocks the secrets of your personal and spiritual universe. It might just be…42


Parshat Pinchas - Typos and Zealots

By Dan Cohen


Proofreading is not my strong suit. My writing improved drastically in accuracy when Microsoft Word introduced spell check decades ago. It’s not that I didn’t know how to spell; I wasn’t willing to sacrifice my speed for missing a few letters or words. Today, using online tools, I count on the wisdom of the software to catch and correct my errors in real-time.  


In its exacting perfection, the Torah contains 304,805 letters in a prescribed text that no one can alter. A sofer (scribe) who writes a Torah with quill and ink on animal skin must do so flawlessly.  No blemishes or mistakes are tolerated, underscoring the awe-inspiring reverence for this sacred text. 

If a word is missing or a letter is wrong, the Torah must be returned to a sofer for repair. This means stopping and swapping a Torah during the actual reading if necessary.


Amidst that idea of perfection, we are confronted with a blemish this week. However, this one most sages agree needs to be there and teaches us important lessons about religious zeal and national unity. 

But first, who was Pinchas? 


In last week’s Torah portion, Pinchas took matters into his own hands and killed two people engaged in immoral behavior in violation of orders from Moshe and Hashem. Pinchas killed Zimri, the son of Salu, a prince of the father’s house of the Simeonites. He also killed Cozbi, the daughter of Zur, an influential Midianite leader.  


Pinchas, a grandson of Aaron, was not initially made a priest together with the sons of Aaron. However, as a reward for his actions, G-d gave him an eternal covenant of priesthood.

G-d also honors Pinchas for his zeal and grants him the covenant of peace. This concept troubled our rabbis, who sought to understand how G-d chose to reward Pinchas after he took two lives, even if the individuals deserved punishment. 


Chapter 25, Verse 11 and 12 says, Phinehas (Pinchas) the son of Eleazar the son of Aaron the kohen has turned My anger away from the children of Israel by his zealously avenging Me among them so that I did not destroy the children of Israel because of My zeal. Therefore, say, "I hereby give him My covenant of peace.”

When written, the vav in the word Shalom is broken. Imagine two vertical lines with a small break. Sure, there is also some calligraphy flourish (see photo). As if to tamp down any controversy, the Talmud in Kedushin 66b cites Rabbi Nachman, who states that the “vav” in the word Shalom, is “k’tee’ah,” broken.  

It is not a mere typo but a deliberate imperfection with profound meaning. Why is this imperfect letter in our Torah?


Many of the sages focus on the difference between the words Shalom (written with a vav) and Shalem (written without one). Shalom can mean peace, but Shalem implies something even more profound, like wholeness. As a nation and individuals, we work and fight to achieve peace but can only find our wholeness in our relationship with Hashem. 


Rabbi Ephraim Buchwald, writing on Chabad.com, shares an insight from Rabbi Berel Wein. He suggests that the "Covenant of Peace" bestowed upon Pinchas might seem surprising given his zealous actions. However, the broken "vav" in the word "peace" sends an important message. While zealotry may be necessary in rare, exceptional cases, it is not the typical or desired path in Jewish tradition.


Pinchas undergoes a profound transformation following this covenant from a zealot to a peacemaker. His evolution, mirroring that of his grandfather Aaron, is a powerful testament to the Jewish value of striving for harmony and understanding. 


Rabbi Ephraim Buchwald also shares an enlightening perspective from Rabbi Shlomo Yosef Zevin on the symbolism of the broken vav. Rabbi Zevin explains that there are two types of 'unity.' 


There is mechanical unity, which is superficial and lacks integration. Imagine two sticks glued together.

Then, there is organic unity, which is natural and internal and leads to genuine harmony. This organic unity, where our bond with each other and Hashem is deep and authentic, is the type of unity the Jewish people should strive for. We should work to have a 'vav' that is united, not broken, representing that true unity is complete and harmonious. That is what was missing during Pinchas’ era.


Rav Hirsch adds two ideas. The first is that the broken vav symbolizes a time when leadership is challenged, and the zeal of someone like Pinchas is required. In our case, a tribal prince directly challenged Moshe and Gd with his actions with the Midianite woman. Pinchas’ effort was to restore not just peace (shalom) but the wholeness (shalem) of the people in the relationship between the people and its leaders. 


The second speaks to the broken vav representing the fractured peace among our nation. In the desert, Zimri’s actions split the nation apart. Hirsch teaches that we cannot repair our society by avoiding conflicts. We must actively engage in conflicts to fight for justice in these moments.  


Pinchas’ zealotry was a “disturbance of the peace,” but peace, Hirsch adds, requires us to sacrifice everything we own to achieve. We must take action when necessary. A zeal-driven effort, even if disruptive, is designed to help everyone find peace with each other and Gd.


Conversely, our “vav” stands broken when we avoid conflicts, cede public spaces to agents working against Gd’s will, and allow others to stir up strife with Gd. Hirsch points out that by failing to act to keep the peace, we make peace with the enemies of Gd.  He concludes that we cannot avoid conflict in the name of peace when Gd’s honor and our spiritual survival are at stake.  


I hope you find inspiration in Pinchas's difficult choice and are willing to fight for what you believe in and what you believe Gd wants from and for us. Pinchas, through his actions, sought to repair a broken people and a broken covenant. 


That doesn’t mean being a scold to others, but it does mean looking for ways to bring organic unity where there is division and demonstrate faith where it is lacking. And to always check and recheck your documents for typos!


SHARE YOUR STORY. SEND US A LETTER.

bottom of page